Bartlett connections: Trying to connect the dots
mom3moos
I have been able to successfully trace my line back to 1840. The oldest member is Curtis Bartlett b abt 1810 married Eliza Abbott b abt 1814.
I have traced them by way of census' and death records of the children.
I believe I have Curtis and Eliza's marriage cert, but it only states Eliza Abbott married "~~~~" in 1833. if Im looking at the 1840 census, they have a son John - 6 yrs old. It matches up.
Anyway, this is where Im stuck. I have been able to do a DNA test on my uncle and there are matches, but who we match up with, have the line so far away, I can not connect our Bartlett tree with their Bartlett tree.
by mom3moos
Profile | 
Research |
Contact | Subscribe | Block this user on 2017-05-26 15:48:34
mom3moos has been a Family Tree Circles member since May 2017.
Comments
wizard28 on 2017-05-26 19:42:19Where is this family from?
wizard28 on 2017-05-26 19:53:00Is the the correct family?
1850 US Census Transcription
Curtis Bartlett Male 40 1810 Virginia
Eliza Bartlett Female 36 1814 Ohio
John Bartlett Male 16 1834 Ohio
First name(s) Curtis
Last name Bartlett
Gender: Male
Age 40
Birth year 1810
Birth place Virginia
Dwelling 550
City/township Anderson
County Hamilton
State Ohio
NARA series 444678
Record set Us Census 1850
Category Census, land & surveys
Subcategory Census
Collections from United States
mom3moos on 2017-05-26 20:10:18Yes, that is the correct family. The family on the 1850 census is NOT microfiche'ed together. The next page (that has the rest of the family) is actually microfiche'ed a few pages away.
I have been able to find the 1840 census as well.
From what I am told, my line decends from the Bartlett line coming from CT. However, I can not prove or disprove that because I can not connect the dots between.