So Many Unasked Questions About Philip Williams and Ann Vest
On the marriage license between Philip Williams and Ann Vest, is the listed bondsman, Isaac Vest. An Isaac Vest old enough to stand as bondsman, (whatever that means), is not mentioned in the official Vest family website. If anyone could locate this Isaac Vest, it would greatly help solving the ever-present mysteries of the Williams Vest union. Another problem is whether their children were illegitimate or whether Ann ever gave birth to any of them with Philip. If they were born in the 1750s and only married in 1808, then they would have been having children at nearly 60! Not impossible, but unlikely. This gives rise to the next problem- in order for any of them to have been on the Guion-Miller Rolls, they would have had to have been born legitimately. Perhaps the legitimate offspring of illegitimate children were ok? The ones who appeared on the Rolls apparently were grandkids of Philip and Ann.
So many questions about this affair! The more that are asked, the more which pop up!
on 2015-08-10 11:54:49
AniWmsBlair , from NC USA, Born and Bred, has been a Family Tree Circles member since Jul 2015.
Comments
Bondsman
Definition: In earlier times, a marriage bond was given to the court by the intended groom prior to his marriage. It affirmed that there was no moral or legal reason why the couple could not be married and it also affirmed that the groom would not change his mind. If he did, and did not marry the intended bride, he would forfeit the bond. The bondsman, or surety, was often a brother or uncle to the bride, not necessarily a parent. The bondsman could also be related to the groom, or even be a neighbor or friend, but those situations occurred less often.
Thanks! I figured that Isaac was a brother or uncle. I just cannot find an Isaac born in that time frame in the Vest Family tree.
Why oh Why are there so many Williamses and all named John, William or some other common name!?